Page 6 - Cannabis for the Management of Pain: Assessment of Safety Study
P. 6

1238  The Journal of Pain                                           Cannabis for the Management of Pain
            Table 2. SAEs Categorized by System Organ Class

                          SERIOUS AEs                        CANNABIS GROUP                 CONTROL GROUP
                   SYSTEM ORGAN CLASS (MEDDRA)       NUMBER OF EVENTS    RATE*      NUMBER OF EVENTS    RATE*
            Surgical and medical procedures               10            5.65             11            5.39
            Gastrointestinal disorders                    10            5.65              7y           3.43
            Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders  5          2.82              6            2.94
            Injury, poisoning, and procedural complications  4          2.26              1             .49
            Renal and urinary disorders                    3            1.69              1             .49
            Nervous system disorders                       2            1.13              4            1.96
            Respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders  1          .56              7            3.43
            Infections and infestations                    1             .56              5            2.45
            Vascular disorders                             1             .56              3            1.47
            Metabolism and nutrition disorders             1             .56              2             .98
            Psychiatric disorders                          1             .56              2z            .98
            Investigations                                 1             .56              0             .00
            General disorders and administration site conditions  0      .00              3            1.47
            Blood and lymphatic system disorders           0             .00              1             .49
            Eye disorders                                  0             .00              1             .49
            Hepatobiliary disorders                        0             .00              1             .49
            Immune system disorders                        0             .00              1             .49
            Total                                         40            22.60x           56           27.45x
            Total number of patients                      28            13.02%k          42           19.44%k
            *Unit: n/100 person-years.
            yOne patient died in the operating room.
            zOne patient committed suicide.
            xThe rates of serious AEs did not differ significantly between these 2 groups (Unadjusted incidence rate ratio = .82, 95% CI = .46–1.46).
             The risk of having reported at least 1 SAE was not significantly different between 2 groups (Unadjusted odds ratio = .62, 95% CI = .37–1.04).
            k
            assessed as certainly/very likely related to cannabis were  Pulmonary Function Tests
            somnolence (n = 5, .6%), amnesia (n = 4, .5%), cough
                                                                After adjusting for tobacco smoking and other covari-
            (n = 4, .5%), nausea (n = 4, .5%), dizziness (n = 3, .4%),  ates, we did not find a significant change in slow vital ca-
            euphoric mood (n = 3, .4%), hyperhidrosis (n = 2, .2%),
                                                              pacity, functional residual capacity, and total lung
            and paranoia (n = 2, .2%) (Supplementary Table 7).  capacity over 1 year among the cannabis users. Residual
              In the control group, gastrointestinal disorders  volume was reduced (mean reduction 142 mL), and a
            (n = 101, 17.4%) and nervous system disorders (n = 93,  mean decline of 54 mL in FEV 1 and a mean decrease of
            16.0%) were the most frequently reported (Table 3).
                                                              .78% in the FEV 1 /FVC ratio were noted. The FEF 25–75%
            The majority of AEs among controls were mild (57.3%)
                                                              was lower with a mean decrease of .2; no change was
            or moderate (42.0%); 4 (.7%) were categorized as ‘‘se-  observed in FVC (Supplementary Tables 13 and 14).
            vere’’ (abdominal pain, breast cancer, pulmonary embo-
            lism,  and  upper   respiratory  tract  infection)  Blood Tests
            (Supplementary Tables 6–8).
                                                                Seventy-eight patients in the cannabis group had
            Multiple Regression Analyses                      blood tests conducted at baseline and at 1 year. No
                                                              changes in liver, renal, and endocrine function were
              The association between cannabis use and the rate of
                                                              observed (Supplementary Tables 15 and 16).
            AEs is summarized in Table 4. Medical cannabis users
            had an increased risk of non-serious AEs (adjusted
            IRR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.42–2.14) but not SAEs (adjusted  Efficacy Measures
            IRR = 1.08, 95% CI = .57–2.04). Increasing the daily dose  Pain Intensity
            of cannabis did not lead to higher risks of SAEs or AEs
                                                                Compared with baseline, a significant reduction in
            (Supplementary Table 10).
                                                              average pain intensity over 1 year was observed in the
                                                              cannabis group (change = .92; 95% CI = .62–1.23) but
            Neurocognitive Tests                              not in the control group (change = .18; 95% CI = .13
              Significant improvements were observed in all neuro-  to .49). After adjusting for confounders, a greater reduc-
            cognitive subtests after 6 and 12 months in cannabis  tion in pain was observed among cannabis users than
            users and controls (Table 5). After adjusting for age,  among controls (difference = 1.10, 95% CI = .72–1.56)
            gender, education, alcohol history, disability status, con-  (Fig 3; Supplementary Tables 17 and 18).
            current average pain intensity, quality of life, and clinic
            sites, no difference in neurocognitive function after 1  Quality of Life
            year was found between cannabis users and controls  With regard to the change in Physical Component
            (Supplementary Table 12).                         Summary (PCS) score, a significant improvement from
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10